Thursday, November 30, 2017

GOP tax bill likely to pass with John McCain's vote

As soon as I'd left a voice-mail for my senator, John McCain to vote No on the GOP tax bill & posted about it here...
https://genxmillennlatino.blogspot.com/2017/11/republican-rushing-tax-bill-its-headed.html
...I see the following news on Twitter:

"McCain backs GOP tax bill as Senate vote looms"




"I believe this legislation, though far from perfect, would enhance American competitiveness, boost the economy, and provide long overdue tax relief for middle class families,” McCain said in a statement. “This is not a perfect bill, but it is one that would deliver much-needed reform to our tax code, grow the economy, and help Americans keep more of their hard-earned money.”
The legislation, which would slash the corporate tax rate and lower rates for many individuals, would increase the deficit by about $1.5 trillion over ten years, and deficit hawks fear the true cost of the plan is much higher.

Democrats have also blasted Republicans for rushing the bill to the floor while considering significant 11th-hour changes to the sprawling tax code rewrite.
“This is tax, one of the most complicated issues before us,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said on the floor Thursday. “These changes and the way the majority leader is handling this make it impossible for any independent analyst to get a good look at the bill and how it would impact our country.”


I am well aware the (post Citizens-United) wealthy donors' voice is a lot more powerful than that of an average voter like myself, but it is still sobering to see it play out so clearly in front of me.

With this bill on the verge of passing, we all know the corporate tax will get slashed (though we don't know how massive the cut). However, we don't know what the consequences will be for the middle-class in the foreseeable future. The bill is being rushed for a reason, republicans don't want the majority of the American people to see what's in the bill. & I bet even they don't fully comprehend what's in it since they've "yet to see an analysis by the Joint Committee on Taxation". Nevertheless, the wealthy donors want it, so the GOP will most likely pass it:


"Republican Tax Bill Moves Closer to Senate Passage"


"Critical components of the bill remain unfinished, including the size of the corporate tax cut and whether it will retain any ability for individuals to deduct state and local taxes. Senators also have yet to see an analysis by the Joint Committee on Taxation that will project the bill’s likely effects on the American economy and federal budget deficits. The unfinished measures most notably include a provision to satisfy Republican deficit hawks, who form a large enough voting bloc that they could delay the bill or force substantial changes to it.
Still, Republican leaders expressed optimism that they were close to approving the bill."

Republicans rushing tax bill. It's headed for a vote today or tomorrow

The GOP tax bill (which benefits the rich) is already headed for a final vote either today or tomorrow:


"The Senate Is Rushing to Pass Its Tax Bill Because It Stinks"


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/29/opinion/senate-tax-bill-problems-rush.html

"PICKPOCKETING THE MIDDLE CLASS: Like the House tax bill, the Senate measure would change how the government adjusts tax brackets and other tax provisions for inflation, replacing the Consumer Price Index with the Chained Consumer Price Index, which tends to increase at a slower rate. While most taxpayers would not notice an immediate impact, the effects would compound over time as more low- and middle-income families are pushed into higher tax brackets, and as working families receive less help through benefits like the earned-income tax credit.

Over the next decade, changing the inflation measure would mean that families would lose $134 billion by paying more in taxes and receiving fewer benefits than they would under current law, according to Congress’sJoint Committee on Taxation. The increase will be even bigger in future years: $31.5 billion in 2027 alone."


Giving tax cuts to the rich while forcing working-class families to pay more. There's no doubt the Republicans are brazen. I watched a Trump speech in Missouri yesterday in which he appeared to be mocking the middle-class. About the GOP tax bill, the Donald was saying things like "this is not good for me" & "all my wealthy friends will dislike me for this bill":  

https://www.cbsnews.com/live-news/trump-pushes-gop-tax-plan-in-missouri-live-stream-updates/



'"This is not good for me. Me, and some very wealthy friends, not good for me," Mr. Trump said'

One of Trump's favorite phrases is "everybody knows". So I'll use it right now, everybody knows the rich will benefit from this bill, so why say otherwise? I believe it is only to mock us, since there's nothing we can do about it (GOP controls senate, house, and presidency). I know it's a long shot but I still called my senator (again) since I don't want to see my taxes eventually go up. Is that too much to ask? (I was only able to leave voice mail btw). 

Here's a page with all of the senators' phone numbers in case you'd like to call:
 https://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

Wednesday, November 29, 2017

NBC's Matt Lauer fired for "inappropriate sexual behavior". But what about Trump?

Matt Lauer is the latest media personality to be fired:

"Report: Matt Lauer allegedly sexually assaulted NBC staffer during Olympics"


http://www.syracuse.com/tv/index.ssf/2017/11/matt_lauer_fired_sexual_assault_olympics.html

"Details of the alleged sexual misconduct have not been disclosed and Lauer's accuser is reportedly wishing to remain anonymous. A source told Page Six that the claim revolves around NBC's coverage of the Olympics in Russia. (The publication initially said it was at the Rio Olympics in 2016.)
"This happened so quickly. She didn't go to the media, she made a complaint to NBC's human resources, and her evidence was so compelling that Matt was fired on Tuesday night. The victim says she has evidence that this has also happened to other women, but so far we don't have evidence of that," the insider told Page Six."

Better late than never at NBC, I guess. Nevertheless, the current climate in the media against sexual harassers came too late to have affected Donald Trump. 
The hypocrite Trump when not retweeting European fascists's posts (& being condemned by UK PM Theresa May)...

"Theresa May condemns Trump's retweets of UK far-right leader’s anti-Muslim videos"

...tweeted this today:




   
The irony is, Trump would've been the first personality to have been fired by NBC from "The Apprentice" if the Harvey Weinstein scandal had happened a few years ago. 
Trump must think we don't remember his "inappropriate sexual behavior" which is well-documented in the "Access Hollywood" tape:

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/access-hollywood-slams-trumps-questioning-2005-tape-tape/story?id=51447451

It appears our aging president somehow forgot about the "Access Hollywood" tape, & now claims it's not real:

"Trump Is Apparently Telling People the Infamous Access Hollywood Tape Is a Fake"



"Trump allegedly “suggested” to a senator earlier this year that the tape in which he can be heard boasting about how being famous meant he could “grab” women “by the pussy” without consequences “was not authentic,” according to the Times. He also peddled that same information to an adviser recently."

So here we are, events in the media appear to suggest the working-place environment is improving for women. However, we still have a president who claimed he could grab women by the pussy without consequences, so we still have a long way to go.

Tuesday, November 28, 2017

Republican tax plan would cut medicare by a quarter-trillion dollars

In case you had any doubt about who the GOP is working for (hint: wealthy donors), just take a look at their tax plan. Republicans are willing to do anything & everything in order to cut taxes for corporations & the rich, even if it means affecting the demographic (seniors) who voted for them:

"GOP’s Ugly Secret: Tax Plan Would Force Quarter-Trillion Dollar Cut In Medicare"


"The Republican plan to cut taxes for millionaires, billionaires 

and wealthy corporations would increase the deficit by about 


$1.5 billion dollars over the next decade. That would mean 


that if it passes, there would be mandatory, automatic 


spending cuts 
of at least $150 billion in each of the next ten years, 


including $25 billion per year from Medicare.
Over ten years that amounts to a quarter-trillion dollars of Medicare 

cuts right 
at the same time that the baby boom generation 


is demanding more & 
more 
from Medicare."
In addition, half the country will see their taxes increase after 2027: CBO found that by 2019; "Americans earning less than $30,000 a year would be worse off under the Senate bill. By 2021, Americans earning $40,000 or less would be net losers, and by 2027. most people earning less than $75,000 a year would be worse off". But of course, "Millionaires and those earning $100,000 to $500,000 would be big beneficiaries":

"The New GOP Tax Bill Is Worse Than You Think..."


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTzi9Vhy8JY

& for a party of "fiscal conservatism", Republicans have now made it clear they don't care about deficits: 

"The GOP tax plan could be devastating for future generations in America:




  • The GOP's tax plan is unlikely to pay for itself.
  • An aging population puts pressure on entitlement spending, and so tax cuts that are not matched with spending cuts in other areas could be bad for America's fiscal position in the future.
  • The GOP is under pressure to have something to show the electorate before next year's midterms, even if it leads to a massive debt hangover later."
Nevertheless, republicans control the senate, the house, and the presidency, thus they'll probably end up passing this "toxic" tax plan. Today, the GOP even "notched a key victory":

"Senate Budget Committee Approves Tax Bill"


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/28/us/politics/republican-tax-bill.html
"Tuesday kicked off a frenzied effort by Senate Republicans to pass their tax code overhaul, with party leaders hoping to bring it to the Senate floor for a vote by Friday. They notched a key victory on Tuesday while Capitol Hill buzzed about the President Trump’s fight with Democrats."


If there's any hope for this bill to be defeated, Democrats need a unified strategy. Yet I haven't really seen a coherent line of attack. As always, Bernie Sanders is the only politician willing to travel (hit the trail) and fight this bill:

"Bernie Sanders hits the trail again, this time to fight GOP tax bill"


 "Sanders has been involved in other efforts against the tax bill, such as leading a recent conference call organized by MoveOn.org that attracted 11,000 callers and thousands more online.
In addition to condemning the bill for reducing taxes on the wealthy, Sanders is hoping to use the tour to argue the tax plan would pave the way for cuts to Social Security and Medicare, which have proved politically deadly for Republicans in the past."

Monday, November 27, 2017

Longmire S6 final season (spoilers)

I finished watching the final season of "Longmire" & I thought it was all right. As far as the narrative of the season, the main plot still somehow involved the "Hector" vigilante story; this time involving one of Malachi's allies with links to the Irish mob. Thankfully though, Cady Longmire's participation in the show continued as well. Both as lawyer for Native Americans in the Rez but also as the lawyer (shortly) for her dad when he was wrongly accused of killing Baggett.

Longmire's final season also brought back Zach, who I didn't even mention in my review of Longmire seasons 1-5. The former deputy who was fired by Walt called in a noise disturbance complaint against a neighbor & it turned out to be one of the new Hector's violent murders. I always thought Zach was kinda weird (a "close-talker" in Seinfeld-speak). But it just goes to show how much I know about guys's attractiveness, he ended up with the job and with Cady Longmire. 

In my last review I also asked if "Vic will end up having a romantic relationship with Walt?" now that the show is over everybody knows the answer to that particular question. Vic's pregnancy which I also failed to mention in my previous review had a heart-breaking end when she lost her child & thus even contemplated suicide. But as always, Katee Sackhoff turned in a great acting performance in what turned out to be a turbulent final season for Vic.

The tension & hatred from the"Hector" bar fight between Walt & Henry disappeared in season six. In all fairness though, the issue had to be resolved once Henry was saved from certain death by Walt.

Baggett's civil suit (Walt being blamed for Barlow's suicide-by-cop) was resolved when, during his testimony, Nighthorse decided to reveal supporting evidence clearing Walt. But also once Baggett was killed by Lucian Connally. 

I speculated that Nighthorse might have been scheming with Baggett to take over Walt's property (& open a golf resort) but I was way off. Nighthorse was involved with the Irish mob & had (almost) nothing to do with Baggett (as mentioned before). 

Again, the ending was all right. Too much of a happily-ever-after feeling but that's what long-time viewers expect. I still thought Vic would go back to Philly and maybe star in a spinoff called "Vic in PA" (or something) but she ended up with Walt which is fine I guess. 

Although knowing the fictional world of this series, you know something bad's eventually's gonna happen. Henry Standing Bear will now be in charge of the casino, stereotypical? Sure, but the writers' heart is in the right place: an honest man who won't misuse gambling profits & will actually help the population in the rez. However, maybe soon an organized crime group will try to get in on the action? Which can then be a narrative for a spinoff. The Absaroka county police department under the leadership of Cady and Vic and Henry Standing Bear's casino conflicts.

Arizona Cardinals & the NFL regular season's week 12

Week 12 of the NFL's regular season began with "Thursday Night Football" times three because, of course, it was Thanksgiving. Nevertheless, I was so busy with family that I wasn't able to watch any of the games which was ok since family comes first. & besides, I figured the Giants would lose (which they did, losing to the Redskins 10 - 20): 

"Redskins turn back Giants in Thanksgiving nightcap"


http://beta.latimes.com/sports/nfl/la-sp-giants-redskins-20171123-story.html 
"Kirk Cousins threw two touchdown passes to compensate for a pick-six, and the Washington Redskins beat the New York Giants 20-10 on Thursday night on a drab field in a drab game between two injury-depleted teams that did not look ready for prime time."

Alternatively, I figured the Vikings would win (and they did, defeating the Lions 30 - 23):

"Vikings-Lions: Takeaways, things to know from Minnesota's seventh straight victory"


"The Vikings' afternoon started with a methodical 14-play, 80-yard touchdown drive and all but ended with a 37-yard screen pass to Stefon Diggs on second-and-14 with four minutes to go.  That extended a Minnesota drive that resulted in a field goal, making it 30-23 with four minutes to go." 

I would've been more inclined to watch Chargers vs. Cowboys since it'd appear to be more of an interesting match. However, the Chargers easily defeated the Cowboys 28 - 06:

"Cowboys continue to make wrong kind of history in loss to Chargers"

http://www.espn.com/blog/dallas/cowboys/post/_/id/4764118/cowboys-continue-to-make-wrong-kind-of-history-in-loss-to-chargers

"ARLINGTON, Texas -- The Dallas Cowboys' season is in complete free fall.


Everything needs to be questioned following their 28-6 loss to the Los Angeles Chargers on Thursday."


The Cardinals won 24 - 27 in a close exciting game against the Jaguars, but they're still below 500: 

 "Blaine Gabbert beats his former team in a wild finish between the Jaguars and Cardinals"

"The Arizona Cardinals pulled off an upset victory and snapped a four-game winning streak for the Jacksonville Jaguars with a 27-24 win in Week 12 punctuated by a 57-yard field goal by Phil Dawson."

And as far as the NFC West, the Rams also won. They are at first place, by beating the Saints 20-26. The Seahawks also won. They beat the hapless 49ers 24-13, thus:

"Rams, Seahawks headed for epic finish in NFC West race"


http://www.sportingnews.com/nfl/news/rams-seahawks-nfl-playoff-picture-nfc-west-division-race-jared-goff-russell-wilson/1tq93yoirsd1b14npvd7rcwi4s



"The Rams haven't sniffed the NFC West title since the Seahawks stole it from under their noses in 2010. Neither team will be limping to what should be a spectacular finish to the divsion race in 2017."




"The division will be decided in the next five weeks, with the teams' head-to-head rematch coming in Week 15."




The Steelers beat the Packers in a close Sunday Night Football game 28 - 31 which I was able to watch:

"Steelers clutch in thriller over Packers, but it shouldn't have been this hard"

"The gap with the New England Patriots is not exactly closed after the Steelers' sluggish yet brilliant 31-28 win over the Green Bay Packers on Sunday night, a performance that required an insane, toe-dragging, 23-yard sideline catch by Brown to set up Chris Boswell's 53-yard, game-winning kick in the final seconds."

Week 12 ended with the "Monday Night Football" game between the Texans and Ravens, which I'm watching right now.

As for the rest of the games, here's the NFL's page with the results from week 12:


And here's the NFL's page for season standings: